Feed aggregator

I was hesitant to go suiting at the nearest mall because it wasn't Halloween, so I know some people might look down on it. I was really listless one day and decided what the heck, I love making people smile and laugh.

The support and love from most everyone there was much more than I expected. Even the mall security got a big kick out of it even so far as one taking a selfie with me. I had a few people ask me to pose for a picture. I got a lot of smiles from all sorts of people, even people I would not have expected. I even met a couple of people who knew what fursuiters were or had a family member who is a fur and thought it was neat that I was there performing in suit. I didn't really get any negative reactions and the "worst" I got was a few teenage guys looked over and shrugged and kept on walking and one little kid who wanted to rip the tail.

So some people might hate the fandom, and some furs may look down on fursuiters, but the closest mall loves it.

submitted by Terrowin
[link] [24 comments]

submitted by CommandPot
[link] [9 comments]

submitted by artofzod
[link] [2 comments]

Every April I've been trying to do a comic a day series, though this year it's a bit different. I've wanted to share my comics on other sites before, but it's hard because a lot of people seem to like or dislike stuff based on the fact it's furry. Well I ran into this subreddit awhile back, so hopefully you guys like it! In the links on that comic are links to previous years, so you can all judge and laugh/not laugh at my art and jokes!

I'm proud of how far my art has come in the past few years, and I just felt like sharing! Sorry for the self promotion, just my art is one of the things in my life I'm beginning to feel good about

scurries away

Edit: For some reason it didn't link it! Curses: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/16147826 (SFW)

submitted by NamelessImp
[link] [10 comments]

submitted by sysable
[link] [4 comments]

submitted by NoahGoldFox
[link] [11 comments]

submitted by spookyspooks
[link] [29 comments]

I was about an hour and a half late. Sorry guys! As of 12:25 PM EST the top choice is OPTION B. The sidebar rules will be updated soon.

Here's the final tally:

http://i.imgur.com/p7meXUU.png

There have been some discussions and some suggestions about handling how NSFW works here on /r/furry.

With that in mind, and given that a lot of suggestions have come through, I'd like to put a few options out to the users to vote.

I will make a comment for each option, Vote for which one you'd prefer by upvoting that comment. So if you like Option A below, vote for the comment which says "Option A".

Top level comments WILL be removed to keep the voting threads visible. If discussion gets out of hand or if people get nasty in the comment threads I will disable commenting on this post, so keep any comments civil and don't break rule 5.

I will tally the votes at 11AM EST on Sunday, April 5th.

OPTION A

These specific rules, posted in the sidebar, but we will lose most of the sidebar to fit them: 1) any direct show of genitalia or female nipples is to be marked as nsfw

2) Anything scantily clad (bikinis, speedos, lingerie) especially when posed in a suggestive manner (purposefully displaying crotch/groin, breasts, or butt) is to be marked as nsfw

3) Disney nude (nude but not directly [covered with fur etc] showing genitalia or female nipples) is to be marked nsfw if it is posed in a sexual manner (prior definition) and or there remains depiction implied or otherwise of genitalia or female nipples (ie bulges, colored patches of fur, etc)

4) full clothing (pants, shorts, shirts, skirts, dresses, one piece swimsuits) remain acceptable as long as there is no depiction implied or otherwise of genitalia or female nipples

5) excessive violence or gore is to be marked nsfw

6) excessive swearing in conversation, displayed swearing in art, or other objectionable discussion is to be marked nsfw

7) drug usage is to be marked nsfw (smoking, alcohol, etc)

OPTION B

Basic, expanded clarification only: Tag visible genitals (including visible through underwear/clothing) ,visible nipples (m/f), sexual behavior, suggestive clothing(ie, fetish gear), violence, and any drug use(including smoking, drinking, pills, etc). Disney/Barbie-like nudity does not need to be marked NSFW.

NOTE: Bathing suit/underwear pictures will STILL be allowed under this unless they have obvious nipples or genitals showing.

OPTION C

Implement additional flairs for: Suggestive art, nudity, drug use, gore, and "mild nsfw" (but the thumbnails will still be visible unless the post is also marked nsfw).

Automoderator will send a reminder to the user to add a flair to their submission w/instructions. Automatic flairing might have to be disabled for this, but not sure yet.

OPTION D

Leave it how it is and allow the users to continue to self moderate, with occasional step ins from the moderator.

Edit: Enabled contest mode. Didn't realize that was a thing!

submitted by mckatze
[link] [71 comments]

This article

http://www.nj.com/mercer/index.ssf/2015/03/west_windsors_twin_w_rescue_squad_shut_down_after.html

on the New Jersey news site nj.com, deals with the shutting down of West Windsor's Twin "W" Rescue Squad. Towards the end of the article, the (alleged) inappropriate activity at the 2012 NJ FurBQ is mentioned, as it was held on the squad premises.

submitted by CamoRovak
[link] [3 comments]

submitted by Rauthiss
[link] [5 comments]

submitted by TheosTheo
[link] [11 comments]

submitted by TheosTheo
[link] [11 comments]

submitted by DustyTheLion
[link] [8 comments]

submitted by SlipWolf
[link] [6 comments]

submitted by Hemms3
[link] [7 comments]

submitted by Foxes281
[link] [24 comments]

I have been trying to get a group of furries together to play with on a server called Civcraft. Its a no-rules (accept for the usual no cheating and whatnot) server in which players can make laws and enforce them using prison pearl. Using prison pearl, if a player is killed by another play and the killer is holding an ender pearl, the victim is then bound to that pearl and is sent to the end. Most of the time, people don't abuse this as large player controlled governments and factions will capture illegal pearls and players. I have been playing on this server for 3 years now and it is still fun. I have only been pearled once and the imprisonment period only lasted 2 days (this is out of 3-4 years of playing). The map doesn't reset and ores are more realistically placed so trade is a major part of the server. If you want to start a furry city, let me know by leaving your MC name in the comments, as well as your steam name so that I can add/ keep track of everyone who will be in the city. My steam name is Cosmondico, and my MC name is Cosmondico. If you don't feel comfortable leaving your names in the chat, PM it to me. Thanks!

submitted by Cosmondico
[link] [9 comments]

submitted by javandrolf
[link] [4 comments]

Guest article by Laurence “GreenReaper” Parry. Greenreaper is the founder of WikiFur, lead administrator of Inkbunny, and editor-in-chief of Flayrah. This article first appeared on his personal Livejournal.

Many furries think raising money to support needy animals is a good thing. From a purely promotional point of view, it’s also nice to be able to say you “raised $$$$ for fuzzy critters”. As a result, many furry conventions do it.

Charity might seem like a win-win, but there are opportunity costs. Fundraising involves volunteer time, and sometimes money, which could otherwise be spent on awards, food, fans, guests, etc… – things which often relate more directly to the enjoyment of attendees, and the celebration and development of furry-related arts and crafts.

While charity events can be entertaining, particularly when live animals are involved, there are often trade-offs – for example, giving a table in a crowded dealer’s room leaves one fewer table for others, and perhaps a loss in funding; running an event takes volunteers and room slots. Likewise, while it’s not a zero-sum game, many attendees have limited funds, and encouraging them to donate may lower artists’ revenues.

This all needs to be be justified – and the way to do it is to include the organizers’ charitable goals as part of the event’s mission, as stated within its organizing document or bylaws. These statements don’t have to be super-specific, just ‘part of the purpose of this organization is to help raise funds for other non-profit organizations in the areas of X and Y’.

Documenting the nature of an event’s charitable commitment provides clarity to organizers, who are often faced with difficult decisions about resource allocation – e.g. do we save this surplus for future year’s events, or give it to charity? (I’ve seen this play out at a board meeting.)

Organizers may also determine that charitable activities are not going to be part of their core mission. This is good to know, as it can lead to a frank discussion of what is permitted, resulting in more-specific policies – e.g. “each staff member may spend up to 1/8th of their required work hours on charity-related events” or “1/10th of staff positions may be dedicated to charity”. (That doesn’t mean that staff can’t spend more time on charity as individuals; just that the convention’s members aren’t going to pay for it.)

The formal nature of an organization can hint at whether charity should be considered a key part of its operations. For example, Anthrocon is a non-profit social/recreational club (501(c)(7)), with the “sole purpose of [operating] a yearly convention in order to bring together devotees of anthropomorphics from near and far, in a relaxed social atmosphere where fans of all ages may feel welcome [… and is] dedicated to keeping its cost of attendance to a minimum.” You wouldn’t expect such an organization to be focused around fundraising.

In comparison, Midwest FurFest‘s Midwest Furry Fandom and Further Confusion‘s Anthropomorphic Arts and Education are charitable organizations (501(c)(3)); both have support of animal-related events written into their public mission statements (MFF, FC/AAE), albeit as secondary goals. When attending these events, you might reasonably expect a portion of your membership fee to go directly towards charitable goals – or at least to see significant fundraising activities.

Tax-exemption issues aside, neither approach is objectively “better” from a governance perspective; what matters is adherence to the mission. For example, Anthrocon does in fact raise significant amounts for charity—through a variety of entertaining social events—but if it started giving away large chunks of its own money, it’d be reasonable to ask why the membership fee was not reduced instead. Conversely, MFF regularly helps to raise large sums and donates directly to its sponsored charities; if it scaled back its support, there’d be questions to ask.

[There might, of course, be good answers in both cases, such as “large donations improve the guests we can attract” or “we bought art panels this year” – but there should be some reasoned justification based on the organization’s mission.]

In conclusion: if an organization you’re involved with is spending significant time and money on activities outside its documented mission, you should ask why… and if you’re running it, you should fix that, either by scaling back these activities, or including them within your organization’s formal mission.

This doesn’t just apply to charity, of course; but it’s particularly easy to get wrapped up in “doing good deeds” and forget that an event is meant to be serving the interests of furry fans, not our furry friends – or alternatively, to let your charitable activities languish, while claiming it’s still an important part of your mission.

With the proper mission wording in place, and a practice of evaluating ongoing activities against it, staff can make better decisions – and organizers can be more confident that, when they move on, their original goals will endure.

I wrote this post after a brief comment by tfbaxxter on NordicFuzzCon 2015 (a great con, by the way!), but I’ve been interested in charitable activities at conventions for years – this was just a good opportunity to write about it.